
Assessing the patient’s skin is an essential part of a dry eye consultation
Dry eye disease (DED) is often first encountered as ocular surface findings: reduced tear break-up time (TBUT), corneal fluorescein staining, a thin tear meniscus, or visible meibomian gland obstruction. These signs matter, but they are not the whole story.
The TFOS DEWS III definition describes DED as: “a multifactorial, symptomatic disease characterised by a loss of homeostasis of the tear film and/or ocular surface, in which tear film instability and hyperosmolarity, ocular surface inflammation and damage, and neurosensory abnormalities are etiological factors”1.
The uncomfortable clinical question, therefore, is whether we sometimes diagnose the stain rather than the patient.
A patient with a short TBUT may indeed have evaporative dry eye, but why is the tear film unstable? Is rosacea driving meibomian gland dysfunction? Is seborrhoeic dermatitis affecting the lid margin? Is the patient taking antihistamines, antidepressants, isotretinoin or multiple preserved eye drops? Are autoimmune disease, thyroid dysfunction, diabetes, menopause, anxiety, poor sleep, digital device use or contact lens wear contributing?2,3.
A dry eye assessment that stops at fluorescein risks missing the causes that sustain the condition.
Skin assessment
Skin assessment is an essential part of a dry eye consultation. The lid margin is a modified skin surface, and meibomian glands are sebaceous glands. Conditions that affect facial skin and sebaceous function can alter the quality of meibum, promote lid margin inflammation and destabilise the tear film lipid layer3,4.
Rosacea is a key example. Patients may present with facial flushing, telangiectasia, papules or pustules, but ocular involvement can be disproportionate to skin symptoms. Lid margin erythema, telangiectasia, capped glands, cloudy meibum and recurrent chalazia should prompt the clinician to examine the cheeks, nose, forehead and periocular skin rather than simply recording ‘MGD’ and moving on3,4.
Seborrhoeic dermatitis is another common clue. Greasy scale around the brows, lashes, scalp or nasolabial folds may accompany blepharitis and contribute to chronic lid margin inflammation.
Atopic dermatitis and eczema can also alter the periocular skin barrier and may coexist with allergic eye disease, rubbing and medication sensitivity3. Demodex infestation is similarly easy to miss unless lashes and lid skin are inspected carefully.
In each case, the ocular findings are part of a wider dermatological pattern.
Health history: DED as a systemic signal
An effective dry eye history should include systemic disease, hormonal status, gut health, pain symptoms and general wellbeing. Autoimmune conditions such as Sjögren’s syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus are particularly important in aqueous-deficient dry eye, especially when symptoms include dry mouth, joint pain, fatigue or recurrent dental problems4,5.
Thyroid eye disease may increase exposure and tear evaporation through lid retraction, proptosis or incomplete blinking. Diabetes can affect corneal nerves and epithelial healing, while dermatological and inflammatory conditions may drive evaporative disease3,4.
As covered in the Dry Eye Corner Part 7, hormonal factors also matter. DED is more common in women and prevalence increases with age, but a useful history goes beyond demographic risk. Menopause, endocrine disease and hormonal medication can influence tear production, meibomian gland function and symptom burden4,5.
Similarly, the TFOS framework recognises neurosensory abnormalities: some patients report severe discomfort despite modest staining, while others show significant staining with fewer symptoms. Asking about chronic pain, migraine, fibromyalgia, anxiety, depression and sleep disturbance can help interpret this sign-symptom mismatch and guide referral or co-management where needed1,5.
Medication review

Reviewing a patient’s medication should be treated as part of the dry eye examination
Medication review should be treated as part of the dry eye examination, not as background paperwork. The TFOS DEWS II iatrogenic report highlights that topical medications can cause or aggravate DED through allergic, toxic and inflammatory mechanisms, and that preservatives such as benzalkonium chloride may worsen ocular surface compromise2. This is particularly relevant in glaucoma, allergy and chronic postoperative care, where patients may use multiple drops for years2,4.
Systemic medication is equally important. Antihistamines, antidepressants, anxiolytics, decongestants, diuretics, some antihypertensives and hormonal therapies are commonly associated with dry eye symptoms2,4. Isotretinoin is especially relevant to skin-focused assessment because it reduces sebaceous gland activity and can adversely affect meibomian gland function. A patient treated for acne or rosacea may therefore carry both the dermatological risk factor and the medication-related risk factor for DED2,3.
Obviously, it is not for the clinician to alter systemic medication independently, but to recognise modifiable contributors and communicate clearly with the patient’s GP, dermatologist, rheumatologist or pharmacist.
Where a medicine is essential, management may focus on ocular surface protection, preservative-free options, lid disease control and realistic counselling. Where a medicine is elective or one of several options, collaborative discussion may reduce ocular surface burden2,4.
From test battery to clinical reasoning
TFOS DEWS II diagnostic methodology recommends symptom screening, exclusion of mimicking conditions and a set of objective signs including tear film break-up, osmolarity where available, and ocular surface staining, followed by assessment of meibomian gland dysfunction, lipid layer behaviour and tear volume to subclassify disease6.
In day-to-day practice, this means the clinician should move from, ‘Does this patient have dry eye?’ to ‘What pattern of dry eye is present?’; ‘What is driving it?’; and ‘What must be addressed for treatment to work?’4,6.
A practical consultation might include three additional habits.
Conclusion
DED is multifactorial in definition, mechanism and management1,5. Skin clues may uncover rosacea, seborrhoeic disease, eczema or Demodex3. Health history may reveal autoimmune, endocrine, neurological or hormonal influences4,5. Medication review may identify iatrogenic contributors that explain treatment resistance2.
If we accept the TFOS definitions in theory, our assessment must reflect them in practice: dry eye care should be ocular surface medicine, not fluorescein pattern recognition.
References
Keith Tempany FBDO CL FBCLA qualified in 1976 and worked in both independent and multiple practice before opening a fee-based contact lens only practice in 2002. He is a fellow and a past president of the British Contact Lens Association (BCLA) and oversaw the development and launch of its Myopia Management Certificate. Keith is the store director of Leightons & Tempany Opticians & Hearing Care in Poole, and works as an independent consultant. He is an experienced author, lecturer and facilitator of contact lens and dry eye education both nationally and internationally.