GOC updates sanctions guidance

The General Optical Council (GOC) has published updated Hearings and Indicative Sanctions guidance, to improve clarity for Fitness to Practise Committees (FTPCs) when considering applying sanctions as part of FTP proceedings.

The updated guidance forms part of the GOC’s ongoing commitment “to improve transparency and trust in its FTP process”, said the regulator.

Last year, the GOC held a consultation on the proposed changes, receiving feedback and views from a range of stakeholders, including the Professional Standards Authority.

Updates to the guidance include:

• A clear definition of hearsay, including examples to support FTPCs when applications rely on hearsay evidence
• An explanation of factors such as situational vulnerability and special measures, which might support vulnerable witnesses in providing best evidence
• Minor edits to the language to reflect a more balanced approach to dishonesty
• Updated section on review hearings to better reflect circumstances where a review hearing might be required
• Clear definitions to distinguish between sexual harassment and sexual motivation

Carole Auchterlonie, GOC director of regulatory operations, said: “Firstly, I’d like to thank everyone that responded to our consultation. Your feedback has been important to ensure that the guidance is up-to-date and fit for purpose. We’ve listened to your feedback and where appropriate, we have made updates to the guidance so that is clearer, without being prescriptive, for our committees when considering whether or not to apply sanctions. This updated guidance marks an important next step in our journey to improve our fitness to practise process and make sure it’s fair for all involved.”

The previous guidance will apply for any part heard hearings, which started before 20 July and have not yet concluded.

View the GOC’s updated Hearings and Indicative Sanctions guidance – and consultation response.